Showing posts with label google. Show all posts

Google offers Free WiFi at O-Zone hotspots in India for Google+ users


Google has partnered with O-Zone to offer free WiFi for Google+ users across India, according to Business Standard. This initiative is to increase the mobile internet usage and let the consumers experience Google+ and YouTube on their portable devices.
Google+ users will get free and unlimited access to Google+ on the Wi-Fi network at all O-Zone hotspots across the country. They can also watch exclusive movie clips and promotions on YouTube for 10 minutes each week at no cost. Ozone has 5,000 Wi-Fi access points across India in various locations such as Coffee shops, Hospitals, Hotels, Book Stores, Restaurant etc.
This would go live this weekend and would be available for 3 months across India at all O-Zone Wi-Fi hotspots. O-Zone is also in talks with Google to make it a long-term contract. O-Zone plans to have 50,000 hotspots and become India’s largest Wi-Fi services provider by 2013.
Via: Fonearena

Apple rumored to take on Google's 3D maps with superior technology

Evidence continues to point to Apple actively developing a 3D mapping surface through a combination of acquisitions and in-house development, with recent rumors suggesting that the iPhone maker has acquired a Swedish 3D mapping company.

A bevy of reports noted on Saturday (via PC Mag) that Apple may have purchased its third mapping company in roughly two years.

In August, MacRumors noted that, according to local reports, a "company in the Western world" had purchased Sweden-based 3D mapping company C3 Technologies. At the time, Apple was among those speculated to be the purchaser, with Microsoft and Google also named as possible buyers.

It has now been suggested that Apple was indeed the company that snatched up C3. The mapping company uses once classified military targeting technology to create 3D maps.Technology Review reported in April of this year that C3's 3D mapping method entailed using planes equipped with angled digital SLR cameras to take aerial photos that capture the sides of buildings as well as the tops. Those images were then supplemented with photos from additional camera angles to create a full 3D rendering of a city.

"Unlike Google or Bing, all of our maps are 360° explorable," C3 Chief Strategy Officer Paul Smith said earlier this year. "Everything, every building, every tree, every landmark, from the city center to the suburbs, is captured in 3D—not just a few select buildings."

Swedish defense company Saab AB, also the parent company to Saab Automobiles, reportedly sold its 57.8 percent stake in C3 for as much as $150 million. As such, some have said that a full purchase of the company may have cost Apple upwards of $250 million.



Apple has shown a keen interest in mapping companies in recent years. In 2010, the iPhone maker acquired Web-based map company Poly 9. Prior to the acquisition, Poly 9 offered a "cross-browser, cross-platform 3D globe" product that did not require any downloads.

In 2009, the Cupertino, Calif., company purchased Placebase, a Google Maps competitor, sparking speculation that it was looking to decrease its dependance on Google technology for the Maps application on the iPhone. In 2010, it was revealed that Apple had begun using its own databases for location-based services, although it continues to rely on Google for maps and the Street View feature.

Apple's bet with its Siri voice assistant technology, also an acquisition from 2010, could help further reduce the reliance. Though the service is able to query Google's search engine, it alsorelies heavily on non-Google services such as Wolfram Alpha, Wikipedia and Yelp. Interestingly enough, Apple's FAQ on Siri notes that currently Maps and local search support are only available in the U.S., with support coming to additional countries in 2012.

Patents and job openings at Apple continue to point to coming advances in mapping technology from the company. Earlier this year, AppleInsider discovered two job listings for the position of "iOS Maps Application Developer." According to the posting, Apple is looking to "radically improve how people interact with maps and location-based services." The developers Apple was seeking were to have experience developing "sophisticated user interfaces" and would be required to work closely with the company's human interface team to craft "new and innovative features for iOS devices."

In 2010, a set of Apple patent applications showed that the company was looking into using future iPhones to generate 3D models of an object or place. More recently, Apple filed an application entitled "Augmented Reality Maps" for an invention that would overlay data such as directions or street names in real time on top of live video. Apple has also filed for a "Schematic Maps" patent where a mapping application would dynamically emphasize or exaggerate details such as roads or landmarks.


Source - [ appleinsider.com ]

iPhone 5 release date has Google buying Verizon Droid vendor Motorola

Apple’s mobile strategy for 2011 is straightforward: pick a release date for the iOS 5 based iPhone 5 on Verizon and AT&T (and perhaps Sprint and T-Mobile) along with the iPod touch 5 and iPad 3. But mobile rival Google’s strategy for the rest of the year is suddenly more hazy, as the company just bought the mobile division of Motorola, the company which manufactures the Verizon Droid among other Android based phones. This changes the landscape both in terms of the role of the Droid even as Verizon has set its sights on the iPhone 5 as its flagship instead, and it puts the fate of Google’s own Nexus line of Android phones in question. But how does this all relate to someone who’s already decided the iPhone 5 will be their next smartphone? Indirectly, of course.
Verizon hasn’t given up on selling the Droid altogether, but its former in-house flagship smartphone (a joint project with Motorola) was getting abused at the hands of AT&T’s iPhone to such an extent that Verizon cried uncle. After seeing Droid sales which were only about forty percent of that of the AT&T iPhone 4, Verizon decided that not only did it want the iPhone as its flagship instead, it didn’t even want to wait for the iPhone 5. As such, the Verizon iPhone 4 launched as a bridge earlier this year. And now Verizon says that its hopes for future growth are pinned on the iPhone 5, even going so far as to blame its lack of growth this quarter on the fact that the iPhone 5 hasn’t yet seen its release date. And yet now here comes Google itself buying the company which manufactures the Droid. In other words, even as Verizon is less interested in pushing the Droid than ever, Google is now set to push the Droid on its own. So even as Verizon gears up to push the iPhone 5 as if its future depends on it, get ready to watch Google/Motorola incongruously push the Droid on Verizon users. Oh, and as Google can make it all back from its Android-based mobile advertising network, expect the Droid to get really cheap or even free. This could cause Apple to have to seriously consider making the iPhone 5 less expensive than previous iPhones. See, told you this could relate back to the iPhone. But there’s more….
Even as the Android platform has collectively enjoyed great sales success, the paradox has been that each carrier’s pet Android model has suffered at the hands on the iPhone. Even as Verizon’s Droid failed to match iPhone 4 sales, the same has been playing out with Sprint and T-Mobile and their respective flagship Android models, leading to widespread speculation that one or both will have the iPhone 5 before the end of the year. But even amidst the collective overwhelming success of Android, and the middling success of each carrier-based model, one Android variant has routinely flopped: Google’s own in-house Nexus line of phones…
So what will Google do with the Nexus now that it’s got the Droid and other Motorola-based Android phones in its pocket? That remains to be seen. Google recently made a deal with AT&T to sell the Nexus phone, but that could go by the wayside if the Moto acquisition means the end of Google’s Nexus focus. Whereas up until now, Google’s strategy was to get the Android OS onto as many different hardware variants as possible from as many manufacturers as possible, the fact that Google now has the Motorola Android phones and tablets in house means that that strategy could change. Android makers HTC and Samsung are in the midst of getting destroyed in the legal system over their Android-based phones and tablets which Apple says borrow way to heavily from the iPhone and iPad. With those companies now suddenly on the outside of the Android hierarchy looking in, could they end up dropping their Android OS based devices altogether so as to make the legal crucification go away? After all, with Motorola’s Android products clearly going to be the ones which Google is now pushing, Samsung and HTC and others will now need to rethink their Android involvement in terms of cost vs benefit. The benefit is likely set to shrink, and the cost may end up being the financial solvency of the company.
This makes for the prospect of far fewer Android-based phones on the market in the future, if not by the time of the iPhone 5 release date then almost certainly by the time of the iPhone 6 next year. Third party licensees are always less likely to get involved when the licensor has their own powerful in-house competing brand, particularly if it turns out that phones like the Droid end up seeing favoritism in terms of promotion, software updates, carrier negotiations, and so on. Instead the iPhone 5, iPad 3, and Apple’s other iOS 5 based devices could be competing with a smaller number of more centrally-promoted Android devices. Which come to think of it, means the Android lineup will come closer to resembling Apple’s tightly focused iOS lineup going forward than in Android’s comparatively “wild west” days up until now. From an iPhone user’s perspective, at least you’ll only have to be barraged by ads for a fraction as many Android phones you have no intention of ever touching. From an Android user’s perspective, we’ll see what this all means.
Source - [ beatweek.com ]

Google buys Motorola in $12.5 billion takeover !




This week opened with an announcement that has taken the tech world by storm: Google (GOOG) is buying Motorola (MMI) for $12.5 billion.
This is a huge, huge move. In fact, it is hands down the most important development in the industry this entire year. Google just played a card that no one saw coming, and the full ramifications of this acquisition is something that won't be seen for quite some time.
Sure, there were rumors of Google's interest in acquiring Motorola's cell phone division that extend back as far as January of last year, but this was just idle gossip on the grapevine. No one took it any more seriously than any of the recent rumors that Google might be looking to buy Research in Motion (RIMM).
What was once just a rumor has transformed into breaking news today. At this juncture, we don't have nearly enough data to form any tangible conclusions, but my gut reaction is that this is a desperation play by Google. Google investors seem to share my ambivalence: at the time of this writing, the stock is in the red while the broader market is up.
That Google would make such a move seems odd given the explosive success the Android OS has enjoyed so far, at least on smartphones. But let's take a look at CEO Larry Page's official blog post about the acquisition that went up this morning. Filter out all the noise about how great Motorola is and how this buyout is going to "supercharge the Android ecosystem," and we find only one clue as to what drove Google's decision to buy Motorola: patent assaults by Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL).
Motorola comes packaged with 17,000 issued patents, which adds a lot of ammunition to Google's patent arsenal. In truth, I believe that this acquisition is about more than just patents, because Google can build a much larger patent portfolio with $12.5 billion than what it receives by gobbling up Motorola. But Page's words show that this is, in part, a defensive move. You don't make defensive moves because you want to, you make them because you have to, because your competitors force your hand. Would Google be buying Motorola if it wasn't feeling the heat from its enemies in the mobile wars, if its partners weren't getting attacked from every angle with infringement lawsuits? Maybe, but I doubt it.
Then there's the issue of how much Google is paying to acquire its Android partner. $12.5 billion is $40/share - a full 63% premium over Motorola's Friday closing price. For an all stock purchase, this is a significantly higher premium that most companies usually pay for an acquisition. This purchase will burn up a full third of the war chest Google's assembled over the years from the profits it has generated from its core search business.
From a fundamental standpoint, the Motorola buyout still seems a great deal cheaper than the $8.5 billion Microsoft (MSFT) paid for Skype earlier this year. However, the difference between Microsoft's Skype acquisition and Google's Motorola acquisition is that with Skype, Microsoft acquired a valuable technology that it can leverage with its core products. Other than Motorola's patent package, it doesn't seem like there's anything in this deal that can add value to Google's current product line. Also, the patents themselves don't enhance value, they are necessities to ensure Android's continued survival.
There's also the extremely important question of how this move is going to affect Google's other Android licensees, like Samsung (SSNLF.PK) and HTC (HTCXF.PK). On today's conference call about the acquisition, Page and his team assured analysts that they've spoken to their top five Android partners before making this announcement, and all were "enthusiastic" about it. They didn't give any more detail on this, even when pressed by analysts, and I'm not sure I buy it.
If you were an Android licensee and you see Google getting into bed with one of your biggest competitors, would you be enthusiastic about it?
Sure, Google's partners benefit indirectly from the vast legal resources Google will gain access to through Motorola's patent portfolio, resources that Google will no doubt utilize to assist them in their own legal battles. But they would probably much prefer it if Google just purchased Motorola's patents directly like the transaction it made with IBM (IBM) instead of acquiring the entire company outright. With Motorola under its wing, Google now has a dog in this fight. Despite the company's famous "do no evil" motto, I have serious doubts about whether or not it can retain its neutrality, doubts that are likely shared by Google's licensing partners.
Whether or not this move will benefit Google in the long run remains to be seen, but it is almost definitely going to benefit Google's competitors. Many OEMs who were formerly loyal to Android may defect to Microsoft's Windows Phone OS. You may have to pay a fee when you license with Microsoft, but at least you know you'll be getting the same package your competitors are. Apple's (AAPL) strategy to create the whole widget in-house just got vindicated by Google's copycat venture into hardware. Not everyone is a winner though. Wireless patent developer InterDigital (IDCC) saw its stock take a 16% plunge in the pre-market after this news broke. InterDigital's stock had run up recently on speculations of a potential takeover bid by Google, but with Motorola's portfolio in its arsenal, investors realized that Google doesn't need InterDigital quite as much anymore.
Make no mistake: Google's acquisition of Motorola is a game changing move with massive ripple effects that'll reshape the entire landscape of the mobile computing industry. Some will win, others will lose, but when the dust settles, things aren't going to be the same ever again. The mobile wars are just beginning, and the ultimate victors are far from decided. Google has made a very bold play here. Whether or not it's also a smart play remains to be seen, but I, for one, will be sitting tight to see how the rest of this story unfolds in the days to come

Source - [ seekingalpha.com ]

Google changing way brain remembers information

Internet search engines like Google are changing the way our brains remember information, according to a new study that says readily available information online makes people easily forget facts since computers become their “external memory”. Researchers from Harvard University and Columbia .



University said Google and databases such as Amazon.com, IMDb.com serve as an external “memory, where information is stored collectively outside ourselves”.
People are more likely to remember things they think they will not be able to find online and will have a harder time recalling information which they know they can easily access online, the study added.
“Since the advent of search engines, we are re-organising the way we remember things,” Columbia University psychologist Betsy Sparrow said.
Our brains rely on the Internet for memory in much the same way they rely on the memory of a friend, family member or co-worker.
The research also found that people remembered where they stored their information or where to look for information on the internet better than they remembered the information itself.
In the paper titled “Google Effects on Memory: Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips,” researchers conducted four experiments.
They gave students 40 statements, asking them to type the information on a computer.
Those who were told the information would be saved had a much harder time remembering the statements later than those who were told it would be erased.
Similarly, Columbia students were asked a series of questions and allowed to take notes.
The students who were told the information would be saved in one of six computer folders had a harder time remembering the information later than those who were told it would be erased.
poor memory
Researchers found increasing number of users relied on their computers as a form of ‘external memory’ as frequent use of online information libraries ‘wired’ human brains
The study, examining the so-called ‘Google effect’, found people had poor recall of knowledge if they knew where answers to questions were easily found.


Source - [ hindustantimes ]

Google “What do you love?” launches at WDYL.com


This morning, we got tipped to check out wdyl.com. The tipster noted that it was apparently a new Google site attempting to “create a unified UI to search in multiple channels”. Sure enough, visiting the URL brought up a Google page — but it was a 404 page. Turns out it needs the “www” in order to work. Yes, wdyl.com is not quite ready for prime-time. But it is out there, live!
The new service, which Google apparently did launch this morning, is called What do you love? (hence, wdyl.com). While it seems to be more of a cute gimmick at this time, the idea is to return users a single page of relevant results across many of Google’s products for whatever query is typed into the wdyl search box. The “search” button is even a heart. Cute.
The best queries are for vague, broad terms like “love“, for example. On the results page you’ll find pictures of love, patents about love, love on Google Trends, videos about love, how to say love in different languages, books about love, etc. It can be interesting. But the results showcasing Gmail, Calendar, Chrome, and a few others again show that this is meant to be more of a promotional tool for Google products rather than anything hugely useful. A button at the bottom of each widget takes you directly to the Google product showcased.
The most striking thing about the new site is that it seems pretty well designed — not always a given with Google.
Update: According to a source, wdyl.com quietly rolled out several days ago and the formal launch was set for yesterday, but engineering issues have been holding it back. At least they’ve finally fixed the “www” issue.
Source - [ by Antonio  , techcrunch ]
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...